“The Intern”: Going to extra lengths, or: A theory about an entire group of people based on one movie » Porn Valley Life

09-21-2007

“The Intern”: Going to extra lengths, or: A theory about an entire group of people based on one movie

I watched Lucas Entertainment’s “The Intern” recently and really enjoyed it. The group of men in this big budget gay porn film seemed to really care about each other.

Whatever side of the orientation fence you’re on, if you jump from side to side like a trick pony, or if you straddle it, I’m sure you will agree that Lucas Entertainment makes good movies.

But I was intrigued that nearly every one of the guys in the movie was uncircumcised. It is rare to find an uncircumcised fellow in straight porn. Why is this? I will ask around. Do straight companies shun uncut guys? Do gay audiences like the extra length? Beyond the medical issues (and the bewildering political ones), what do people like better?

My theory is that, since there are a few millimeters more of it, the uncircumcised penis is a plus for the gay male audience. Since straight porn is more about the women, perhaps what the mohel did doesn’t matter as much (unless, of course, the focus is on the carnival aspect of porn, ala Mandingo).

I could be utterly, tragically wrong about this. Feel free to let me know.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Related Posts:
Stood UpBelladonna quits performing with other people Nautica Thorn: Knocked Up and well fed

Link To This Entry | Related Entries: gay, lucas entertainment

Leave a Reply

© 2010 Porn Valley Life. Register | Log in

Copyright © 2007 2257 Listing of Prior Art [R-5] - 2200 Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents 2257 Listing of Prior Art [R-5] The examiner must list on a form PTO-892, if not already listed on a form ** PTO/SB/08A or 08B, or PTO/SB/42 (or on a form having a format equivalent to one of these forms), all prior art patents or printed publications which have been properly cited and relied upon by the reexamination requester in the request under 37 CFR 1.510. The examiner must also list on a form PTO-892, if not already listed on a form ** PTO/SB/08A or 08B, or PTO/SB/42 (or on a form having a format equivalent to one of these forms), all prior art patents or printed publications which have been cited in the decision on the request, applied in making rejections or cited as being pertinent during the reexamination proceedings. Such prior art patents or printed publications may have come to the examiner's attention because: (A) they were of record in the patent file due to a prior art submission under 37 CFR 1.501 which was received prior to the date of the order; (B) they were of record in the patent file as result of earlier examination proceedings; or (C) they were discovered by the examiner during a prior art search. All citations listed on form PTO-892, and all citations not lined-through on any form ** PTO/SB/08A or 08B, or PTO/SB/42 (or on a form having a format equivalent to one of these forms), will be printed on the reexamination certificate under "References Cited." A submission of patents and/or publications is entitled to entry and citation in the reexamination certificate (that will be issued) when it complies with 37 CFR 1.98 and is submitted: (A) by the patent owner in the statement under 37 CFR 1.530; (B) by the reexamination requester in the reply under 37 CFR 1.535; (C) prior to the order of reexamination under 37 CFR 1.501 by any party; and/or (D) by the patent owner under the duty of disclosure requirements of 37 CFR 1.555.